The arts get funded. Social programs get funded.
Yet could it be that this pitch by our right-wing governments is merely a mythology of the economic monoculture? For the first time in my life, I am being challenged to shift to the left politically. I find myself wondering to what degree my ongoing allegiance to the right represents my indoctrination in the monoculture. I hope that the ideas of this book will continue to guide my decisions and help grant me the courage to pay whatever external price may be required of me to hold to my true self.
May 21, Chris rated it liked it. This book is a mess. That's a shame because Michaels makes important, if not novel, observations about the rise of market theory in aspects across our society, and she does a great job of making this message interesting and digestible. With more focus, restraint and effort this could have been a landmark book on contemporary culture. The middle chapters are a moving summary of how economic theory has changed varied aspects of our lives.
The biggest problem is the weakly argued abstraction of the This book is a mess. The biggest problem is the weakly argued abstraction of the current situation into the "monoculture" phenomenon. Michaels mentions three other examples - religion pre-enlightenment, science during the enlightenment, and communism, but goes into no details and gives no justifications for these.
She doesn't flesh out the concept beyond an assertion that it is bad because it destroys diversity and cements a biased point of view as "unbiased". How does a monoculture start?
What existed in Western Culture immediately before the current monoculture? This is a rather large theory to swallow, and Michaels doesn't provide the proof to make it go down smoothly. A book that only considered the dominance of economic forces today would have been leaner, stronger and more persuasive. The examples she provides are of varied quality. They are most illuminating when she contrasts traditional methods of evaluating a library, public school, etc with how they are valued under economic theory.
A frequently re-occurring thread was the dismantling, reduction, or corruption of social programs that were created as late as post-WWII. Are we building economic monoculture or tearing down a leftist monoculture? I didn't find much value in the final chapter. It came of as a call-to-arms with some glossed over examples of counter-mono-culture movements, and some encouraging slogans.
Aug 29, Sara Marks rated it liked it. In exchange for a free copy of the book, I have to post a review.
Visit Our Stores. It really is a fascinating concept, though. Now imagine that one of those stories is taking over the others, narrowing our diversity and creating a monoculture. Kyan F. Auster's novel follows Archibald Isaac Ferguson through four different lives that alter based on little differences from the first chapters. Junix S Junix S.
I have been sitting on this book for months. The premise of the book is that our society and culture develops around one common message. The modern message is one of economics. It did not take much for me to understand exactly what he was talking about. He looks at three different people and organizations that are working against the economic message. I think this was the most important section for me. He leans to summarizing and giving cursory examples rather than going in depth.
Other non-fiction books like this go into much more detail about the studies that give evidence to their points. The books, as a result, reads too much like a logical tirade more than well researched evidence. While many people are OK with that, I want to see real evidence of your point. This became a rant and criticism of society, and it clearly was a criticism, rather than an unbiased observation of what is going on. May 06, H. This book completely captured my attention.
I thought it would be a hard read but I was intrigued right from the beginning about how I could "transcend" the monoculture once I understood it.
I also like how the implications transcend all cultures and all people. The book does a great job of encompassing the main components of most people's lives in the six chapters about work, relationships and the natural world, community, physical and spiritual health, education and creativity - themes that es This book completely captured my attention.
The book does a great job of encompassing the main components of most people's lives in the six chapters about work, relationships and the natural world, community, physical and spiritual health, education and creativity - themes that essentially everyone can understand and relate to in some way. Each chapter and main idea is explained very clearly. So many parts made me sit and ask myself questions about what I thought - I found myself doing that through the whole book.
Each chapter tells the story about how each idea has been in the past, then transitions into what it has come to look like today and how the economic story has changed things, with really great examples to outline the argument. The main points are supported extremely well by evidence, examples and details.
I have learned so much! This book is truly fabulous. The whole thing inspired me - I walked away with so much to ponder and reflect on. I can't wait to hand it out to others. I found myself so excited about the content.
It's all so easy to understand and yet leaves the reader feeling like there is so much depth to what is being said. Truly, truly wonderful. May 13, KR Karen rated it it was amazing Shelves: nonfiction , mustownthis. I want to start this review with one of those deep movie trailer voices - "If there is one non-fiction book you should read this year Read this book.
Full disclosure: FS Michaels is a colleague of mine but this book still kicks non-fiction ass. Because of the rise of the economic story, six areas of your world — your work, your relationships with others and the environment, your community, your physical and spiritual health, your education, and your creativity — are changing, or have already changed, in subtle and not-so-subtle ways.
Monoculture: How One Story Is Changing Everything [F. S. Michaels] on Amazon. com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Winner of the NCTE George. Editorial Reviews. Review. "[Michaels] writes in clear, energetic prose that's thoughtful, engaging and unforced. She defines and analyzes without judgment or.
One of my favorite feelings. Now back to practicing my movie voice. Apr 17, Jodi rated it really liked it.
What I took from this book: we've let money fuck everything up. The economic story has become the dominant one for most everything in life, including things that might should've been left out of it. Things like health care, education, and art. Additionally, when you evaluate everything - having children, your relationships with others, your hobbies even - in terms of how they benefit you or not in economic terms, we lose the character of life and of living as humans.
Not everyone wants to live What I took from this book: we've let money fuck everything up. Not everyone wants to live within the monoculture, much like not everyone wanted to live within communist societies.
But attempting to live differently than most everyone around you is tough. The author asks, "Do we conform to the monoculture and align ourselves with the economic story, or do we exile ourselves from the story that defines so much of our culture?
Asked another way, if life is going to exact a toll no matter what you do, what's stopping you from living exactly as you please, telling your own stories, in line with your own deepest values? It's actually a bit shocking when you start to realize how thoroughly your life and ideas about life are influenced by this main story.
Sep 21, Jon rated it really liked it. I'm just in the early stages, but so far, great read.
I have some strong thoughts on much of what I;ve read so far, including Michael's accurate description of how our current Economic Monoculture is influencing just about everything is Western lives. I just finished reading his take on those who've tried to mix non-profit with a for-profit model, and his take that "experts" agree this is a bad idea. Coming from the Economic mindset, this makes sense. But my own experience shows that there is ye I'm just in the early stages, but so far, great read.
But my own experience shows that there is yet another way, a path where social good can indeed be mixed with a financially self-sustaining model, freeing "good" efforts from the burden of constantly fundraising and seeking donor-driven support. Not that the classic donor-driven non-profit is bad, but in a post-economic monoculture assuming that's where we're headed , a financially self-sustaining model of good seems to make sense.
This path also takes into account another dimension, one that places the "good" organization into the very fabric of the culture itself, something typical non-profits tend to struggle with. But I'm getting ahead of myself, I haven't yet finished the book! Jun 12, Sarah Sammis rated it really liked it Shelves: read-in , review-copy.
Monoculture by F. Michaels looks at how the unwritten and unspoken dominant culture of an area can shape the lives of the people within that culture.
She argues that the current monoculture of the developed world is money — or more broadly the worth of things and actions. Michaels outlines her argument around these key areas: work, relationship with others, relationships with the world, education, physical health, mental health, communities, and creativity. Against each of these areas of the hu Monoculture by F. Against each of these areas of the human condition she tests her thesis. A monoculture, as it is unwritten, doesn't mean the same thing for everyone.
It doesn't turn people into sheep or lemmings, but it can affect lives through government policies and personal choices. Enlightenment, though, can help a person or an entire community break free from the invisible, assumed bonds of the monoculture.
It's a short, quick and fascinating book. I've since passed along my review copy to my friends to read. I received a copy from the author for review. Jun 19, Neocortext rated it it was ok Shelves: It is perhaps unfair to be frustrated with a book called "Monoculture" for being so one-sided in its argument.
But nonetheless, I am. I read this with an eye toward using it in my argumentation and reasoning course, and I may yet do so: the things it does well--constructing a particular perspective--it does very well. But its representation of its sources within its prose is, to my way of thinking, borderline unethical; it relies almost wholly upon endnotes to indicate its source material, and t It is perhaps unfair to be frustrated with a book called "Monoculture" for being so one-sided in its argument.